SQL Server on Linux Clustering—A Few Other Notes

So I was chatting with fellow MVP Allan Hirt (b|t) about the cluster build that I wrote about yesterday, and I had a few more realizations about the Linux HA process as it stands right now. I haven’t talked to the the Linux product team at Microsoft about this, but I hope to in the near future to get a better idea of where things are headed. So these are my notes as of now, strictly relating to failover cluster instances (FCI), AlwaysOn Availablity Groups are coming, but are not in the latest CTPs of SQL Server on Linux.

It was faster than building a Windows cluster

It took me a while, I laughed, I cried, I cursed a lot, but if I look at the time it took for me to actually build the cluster and install SQL Server, it was a much faster process. Much of this comes down to the efficiency of the SQL Server installation process on Linux, which is as simple as running yum install mssql-server (mostly). Which leads me to my next point..

Installation options would be nice

The cluster building process is a little kludgy. Basically, you install two standalone instances of SQL Server, and then remove the data files from one them, and copy them into your NFS share. Having the option to do the equivalent of an “Add Node” install, would mean you wouldn’t need to worry about cleaning up your second node.

There’s no cluster validation, explicitly

This is a bit scarier, or easier depending on your view point. There are tests at various parts of the process to make sure things are working. For example, the first step of building your Linux cluster is to authorize the nodes to take part in the cluster, which validates certain security and network settings. However, the storage validation consists of starting and stopping SQL Server on each node to make sure it can talk to the storage and startup. Given that Microsoft doesn’t own the clusterware for this solution, I’m not sure how much they can enhance that, or if they will. This is a good open question.

There’s no dns

(Happy Late Birthday Kris!) One interesting thing I realized after talking to Allan was that I did all of my networking setup through the /etc/hosts file on each individual node. I remember doing this for RAC, and I think it may be a requirement of Pacemaker, but you will still want to make a DNS entry for your cluster identifier. When you do this on Windows, if you are using Active Directory for DNS, the installation does this for you. Not in Linux, you will need to do this yourself.

Screen Shot 2017-01-04 at 11.40.26 AM

Get comfortable with command line and scripting

There’s no cluster wizard to get you through the process. I think this isn’t a huge deal—Denny and I were talking yesterday about how relatively easy it would be to script the whole process in bash (I’m holding off until I find out if Microsoft is doing this), and most Linux sysadmins are really comfortable with writing bash scripts. But if you aren’t comfortable with Linux and the command line, now is the time to brush up, before things go prod.


We are in the very early days of this process, there is much that will likely change. From a functional and conceptual perspective, this is very similar to the way a SQL Server Failover Cluster works in Windows, but the implementation is quite different. I’d like to see things resemble Windows a bit more, at least from a SQL Server perspective, but we’ll see where the product heads.

SQL Server on Linux–Clustering

First of word of warning on this post—if you are reading it and it isn’t January of 2017, I suspect things may have changed significantly in the months going forward.

Screen Shot 2017-01-03 at 3.47.08 PM

So I did It, I built a SQL cluster on Linux. The process is documented here on BOL, I’m not going to walk you through it, I’ll probably do that in a later post, I just wanted to mention some things I ran into during this build process. First, I did this using VMWare Fusion on my Mac, but I think any virtualization platform that allows virtual networks should work. Secondly, even though BOL says you need Red Hat Enterprise Linux (and you do if you are doing this in prod and require support), I was able to do all of this on CentOS, which is the free as in beer version of RHEL.

In my scenario, I built 3 VMs, one to serve as an NFS server, the other two to be my SQL Servers. Currently, there is no cluster version of the install, it’s the standard installation for standalone SQL on Linux, you then point SQL Server at the NFS mount you created which serves as your shared storage. I had an initial permissions problem on writing my data files there—I did a bad thing on the NFS server and opened up the directory to the world (777), and was then able to copy files there. I’ll follow up on that.

One other thing that wasn’t in BOL, that I had to troubleshoot my way through is that just like a cluster on Windows, you have a cluster identifier and floating IP address. I had to add that to /etc/hosts on each of my nodes to get it to resolve. The article mentions turning off fencing for non-prod environments—I had to do that in order to get failover working correctly in my environment.

Finally, failover was a bit wonky at first, and I had to spend too much time troubleshooting an odd problem. I wrote a connect item for it., but select @@servername and select name from sys.servers returns the name of the host, and not the cluster name. I’m sure the team will fix this in the near future.

%d bloggers like this: