The SQL Herald

Last week, Google announced that they were selling domain registrations for the .zip and .mov top-level domains (TLDs). Google registered these TLDs as part of ICANN’s generic top level domain program. Spammers and threat actors everywhere have rejoiced at this notion–.zip and .mov files are very common malware vectors. While there haven’t been any real-world observations of attacks the SANS institute is recommended proactively blocking these domains from your network, until we better understand their behavior.

There are a number of places to block these domains (and you will see various blogs from DCAC consultants this week about the different areas). I have become our defacto email admin, so I decided to handle the Office 365 side of this.

The first thing you need to do is login to the Exchange Admin Center, which is admin.exchange.microsoft.com.

The way you are going to block a whole TLD, is using mail flow rules. You can also block an entire domain (hiya Chris Beaver), using the accepted domain feature, but that feature doesn’t not allow you to block a TLD. So on the left, expand the mail flow object in the hive, and click on rules, and then click on “Create a Rule”

In your rule, you will first need to give it a name–this is just metadata–I used Blocked Spammy Domains Demo. For where to apply this rule select “The Sender” and then “address matches any of these text patterns” and then add the patterns \.zip$ and \.mov$ as shown below.

Next you have to specify an action–here I’m going to reject the message and include an explanation that gets sent back to the sender. “Buy a better domain spammer”. Next, I’m going to notify the recipient that a spammy domain was trying to email you.

After that, you can click next, and then you will be on the set rule settings page. Select “enforce” and activate this rule and then click next again.

On the final screen, click finish to complete the rule.

Your email is now protected from these spammy domains, that could be nefarious.

I really, really miss speaking at in-person user group meetings–between the death of PASS, and the long tail of the Covid pandemic, while larger scale conferences have returned to some degree, local user groups have been extremely slow to come back in person. While some user groups are still doing remote session (I did a really poorly promoted talk on Azure Active Directory for 3 people last month), they absolutely suck for the speaker, and I suspect are not much fun for the attendees. I have given a couple of talks, but you miss so much in a virtual session.

It’s All About the Networking

When you attend a virtual user group, you might get to talk to a couple of other members of the group for a few minutes before the speaker gives their talk. However, for someone who is new to the group and doesn’t know anyone, it can be really hard to introduce themselves and make connections. I know as a speaker, virtual attendees are far more hesitant to ask questions in a virtual session than they are in a physical one. Additionally, it limits the growth of our community to new members–while virtual events are easy to put on, its the continued relationship building that helps retain new membership.

Let’s Not Forget About New Speakers

One of the challenges of the early days of the pandemic, is that for virtual user group meetings, any UG organizer had their choice of Microsoft MVPs to present to their groups. Typically, limits on travel and such would mean user groups would typically have local speakers, with the occasionally MVP type speaker who happened to be in town. This made it intimidating for newer speakers (the investment in microphones and cameras didn’t help either). Speaking at a user group is a traditional first step for a lot of speakers, additionally, user groups often once or twice a year, held open mic night, giving new speakers a chance to give a short talk to get started with public speaking. Beyond that, it can really help young professionals better understand technology beyond just their jobs.

Note: virtual groups are still valuable–some locations may not have enough population to get speakers every month, or may want to cover specialty topics. One of the things that sucked the most about C&C bankrupting PASS was that the virtual chapters of PASS were thrown out like dust in the wind. They always did a great job of grouping speakers with attendees. But in your local area, there is nothing that beats having a user group to augment your network and learn more about jobs, tech, and make new friendships.

The benefits include:

• Networking opportunities
• A start for new speakers
• Everyone loves pizza.

Finally, if you are having a in-person user group and need a speaker, reach out. I’m not promising anything, but if I’m in the area, or I can make a quick side trip, I’d be happy to speak to your groups.

I recently attended Tech Field Day 26, in Santa Clara, while we spent most of time with the Open Compute summit, and discussing CXL, we got to meet with hardware and software networking vendor, ZPE Systems. ZPE has a number of solutions in the edge and data center spaces that allow you to do secure network management and just as importantly automate large scale data center deployments.

In my opinion there are two main concerns with building out network automation—security and device accessibility. ZPE aims to mitigate both of these risks–with security, by building a secure ring around your infrastructure to limit direct exposure. This ring security model can apply to the OS, but in highly secured networks, access to a secured network boundary layer, can provide similar functionality, ZPE recommends a three ring model, with their hardware solution being the outer boundary. They provide support for multiple network providers as well as support for the latest continuous deployment and integration deployment patterns.

The real secret sauce to ZPE’s solution is that it integrates this automation with a central repository in their cloud service to support:

1. Device (servers, network gear, storage) upgrades, setup, and patching
2. Out-of-band access
3. Access control
4. Logging
5. Monitoring

These configurations are all pushed from the centralized cloud data store. Conceptually, this is like a jump host, but way smarter, with a lot of connectors and support for automation process. ZPE showcased their Network Automation Blueprint seen on the slide above, which launches from their out of band devices.

I use a Mac (Intel, you can only run SQL Server on Edge on Apple chips) as my primary workstation. While I have a Windows VM locally, and several Azure VMs runnining Windows, I can do most of my demo, testing, and development SQL Server work locally using Azure Data Studio, sqlcmd, and SQL Server on Docker. Docker allows me to quickly run any version or edition of SQL Server from 2017-2022 natively on my Mac, and has been nearly 100% compatible with anything I’ve needed Windows for core database functionality. And then this #sqlhelp query came up this morning.

#sqlhelp Came across a message about a ForkID when restoring a backup. Can’t find a decent article that explains and demos such things. Any pointers to a good article on this?

— BrainDonor (@The_BrainDonor) September 26, 2022

The one reference I found to “ForkID” on the internet was in this DBATools issue, given that and the fact that the tweet also referenced backup and restore, my first thought was to query sys.columns in MSDB. So, I did and there were a couple of tables:

Because as shown in the image above, the table in question is a system_table, in order to query it directly, you need to use the dedicated administrator connection (DAC) in SQL Server. The DAC is a piece of SQL Server that dedicates a CPU scheduler, and some memory for a single admin session. This isn’t designed for ordinary use–you should only use it when your server is hosed, and you are trying to kill a process, or when you need to query a system table to answer a twitter post. The DAC is on by default, with a caveat–it can only be accessed locally on the server by default. This would be connected to a server console or RDP session on Windows, or in the case of a container, by shelling into the container itself. However, Microsoft gives you the ability to turn it on for remote access (and you should, DCAC recommends this as a best practice), by using the following T-SQL.

exec sp_configure 'remote admin connections', 1 
GO
RECONFIGURE
GO

This change does not require a restart. However, when I tried this on my Mac, I got the following error:

Basically–that’s a network error. In my container definition, I had only defined port 1433 as being open, and the DAC uses port 1434. If I were using Kubernetes for this container, I could open another port on a running container, however in Docker, I can only do this by killing and redeploying the container.

docker run -e 'ACCEPT_EULA=Y' -e 'SA_PASSWORD=P@ssw0rd!' -e'MSSQL_PID=Developer' -p 1433:1433 -p 1434:1434 -v /Users/joey/mssql:/mssql -d  mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:2022-latest  

I simply expose port 1434 (by the second -p switch in the deployment script) and now I can connect using the DAC. Sadly, there was nothing interesting in sysbrickfiles.

I was working with a client recently, were we had to reconfigure storage within a VM (which is always a messy proposition). In doing so, we were adding and removing disks from the VM. this all happened mostly during a downtime window, so it wasn’t a big deal to down a VM, which is how you can remove a disk from a VM via the portal. However, upon further research, I learned that through the portal you can remove a disk from a running VM.

For the purposes of this demo, I’ve built a a SQL Server VM with two data disks and a single disk for transaction log files. The SQL VMs use Storage Spaces in Windows, which is a recommended best practice–but even if you are not using Storage Spaces, most of this will apply.

How To Identify Your Disk

This is the really important part of this post–how to identify what your disk is in the portal and with your VM. When you define a data disk in the portal, either you or the system will define a LUN number for the individual disk. You can see it on the portal in the below screenshot.

This number is mostly meaningless, except that within Windows, it lets you identify the disk. If you open up Server Manager and navigate to Storage Pools > Physical Disk, you can see where this LUN number shows up.

That number maps back to the values you see in the Azure portal, and unless you size each of your disks differently (which you shouldn’t do for performance reasons). If you aren’t using Storage Spaces, you can also see the LUN number in Disk Management in Windows as shown below.

You can also get this information using PowerShell using the Windows cmdlet Get-PhyiscalDisk.

It is very important to ensure that you have identified the correct disk before you remove it.

Removing the Disk

Azure will let you delete a disk from a running VM. Even if that disk is mounted in the VM and has data on it. Yes, I just did this on my test VM.

If you click one of those highlighted Xs and then click Save, your disk will be removed from your VM. There’s also a series of PowerShell commands you can use to do this. It is also important to note, that at this point your disk is still an Azure resource. Even though you have removed it from the VM, the disk still exists and has all the data it had the moment you detached it from the VM.

If you chose the correct disk to remove from your VM, and you have confirmed that your VM is healthy, you can navigate into the resource group for your VM where you will see your disks.

The important thing to note is that the state of the disk is “Unattached”, which means it’s not connected to a VM. So it can be deleted from Azure–I don’t recommend doing so until you have validated your VMs are running as expected.

You may ask how you can prevent disks from being removed from running VMs. I’ll write a post about this next week, but while you are waiting read up on resource locks in Azure.

Microsoft, in conjunction with Principle Technologies recently produced a benchmark, comparing the performance of Azure SQL Managed Instance, and Amazon RDS SQL Server. I normally really dislike these benchmarks—it can be really hard to build proper comparisons and the services frequently don’t have perfect equivalent service tiers, making them really hard to ultimately compare their performance. In fact, when I was reading this benchmark, I saw something when comparing the two services that made my eyes light up. And then I realized it was a limitation of RDS.

I immediately saw that Azure MI had 320,000 IOPs while AWS only had 64,000. Obviously Azure is going to crush any database benchmark with that difference. And then I did a bit more research. I the visited the AWS docs.

You’ll note that while Oracle RDS does get up to 256,000 IOPs (I guess those customers have more money), SQL Server has a max number of IOPs of 64,000. Needless to say, in this benchmark comparing the price/performance ratio, Managed Instance crushes RDS before you even add in the hybrid licensing benefits that Microsoft supports for Azure SQL services.

But Wait There’s More

While Managed Instance is by no means a perfect service, there are a number of reasons why I strongly recommend against running your database on RDS. Here are the main ones:

• You can’t migrate a TDE encrypted database using backup and restore—you have to extract a BACPAC and import into a database in the service
• The native backup solution doesn’t support restoring a database to point in time.
• You can’t deploy cross-region, meaning, there is no near real-time option for disaster recovery
• There is no instant file initialization which can make some restore and file growth operations extra painful

These are the major concerns, with an additional licensing concern of not being able to use Developer edition for your workloads, means your overall costs to run an environment are going to be a lot higher of you use RDS.

When Not to Choose PaaS?

While RDS has a lot of costs associated with it, and performance is limited, there is a price/performance/data volume curve that I feel I applies to both Azure and AWS platforms. If you need high end storage performance (which means using the Business Critical service tier), on Managed Instance, and your data volume, is more than a terabyte, you have to scale your Managed Instance to 24 cores. If your volume is more than 2 terabytes, you need to scale to 32 cores, and if you need more than 8-16 TB, you will need to scale to 80 cores, which will cost close to $30,000/month. I perfectly understand why this is the cost model—the storage is stored locally on the VM itself rather than remote—so Microsoft can’t put other VMs on that piece of physical hardware.

What Should You Do for SQL Server on AWS?

If you need to run SQL Server an AWS, what should you do? The answer is to use EC2 VMs. Sure you lose the minor benefits of having your servers patched and limited benefits of the backup feature, but you have more granular control over your IO performance and overall configuration.

Tl;dr Azure SQL Managed Instance delivers a lot more throughput than Amazon RDS for SQL Server, so your workloads will run a lot faster on Azure.